More Whacked Out Behaviour!
From: Bill Honeycutt <bill_honeycutt@yahoo.com>
To: priss <sheridanalder>; deb <anamkara>; lstack; kblozowski; david <dbergen@>; dave <david.webb>; dave <dwebb16>; ncgint; dkehler; pals@becon.; bcordner; nrockwell; brockst24; smuir; bwilliamson
Cc: bmcmullan; pchapman; apoulin
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 3:43:33 PM
Subject: FW: "Alder at her best!"
who is sherridan calling for the removal
of a committee member when she can't control her actions
like spewing(attachment) on about what her version of a heritage committee
should look like (quote, not fair and equal) , that there are too many
developer interests on the committee now (quote, too many committee
members that take the approach that they are there to represent
developers, unquote, and how many is too many and who are they?!) and she
finishes boasting that her self-interest group Proud friends dominate this
committee and why shouldn't they(quote, there’s nothing to be gained by
replacing one so-called “special interest group” who has some idea about
heritage standards and spearheaded the drive to designate Port, and since
then attracted people like myself, with another special interest group who
have a demonstrated hostility to accepted heritage standards). if her and
her friends read the omb tower decision it looks like they are the ones
with the demonstrated hostility to heritage standards).
the best laugh is her crying on about losing members (quote, it would be
a crying shame to lose that experience and re-start with from scratch a
new committee that doesn’t know that it is not good heritage practice to
move a building within a heritage district) if anyone at city hall in a
position of authority reads her garbage i think that she may be first in
line for removal by speaking so poorly about fellow members and the role
of the public that she forgot she reps. while we're at it lets get rid of
the whole group and let kevin b. fill in for the rest of this term.
sherridan should not mention a code of conduct, she is breaking the
committee's now and until PDHAC clears the council version she has no leg
to stand on asking anyone to step down even if a committee member was
sharing committee info outside because there is no code to rely on that
would give her that right.
To: priss <sheridanalder>; deb <anamkara>; lstack; kblozowski; david <dbergen@>; dave <david.webb>; dave <dwebb16>; ncgint; dkehler; pals@becon.; bcordner; nrockwell; brockst24; smuir; bwilliamson
Cc: bmcmullan; pchapman; apoulin
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 3:43:33 PM
Subject: FW: "Alder at her best!"
who is sherridan calling for the removal
of a committee member when she can't control her actions
like spewing(attachment) on about what her version of a heritage committee
should look like (quote, not fair and equal) , that there are too many
developer interests on the committee now (quote, too many committee
members that take the approach that they are there to represent
developers, unquote, and how many is too many and who are they?!) and she
finishes boasting that her self-interest group Proud friends dominate this
committee and why shouldn't they(quote, there’s nothing to be gained by
replacing one so-called “special interest group” who has some idea about
heritage standards and spearheaded the drive to designate Port, and since
then attracted people like myself, with another special interest group who
have a demonstrated hostility to accepted heritage standards). if her and
her friends read the omb tower decision it looks like they are the ones
with the demonstrated hostility to heritage standards).
the best laugh is her crying on about losing members (quote, it would be
a crying shame to lose that experience and re-start with from scratch a
new committee that doesn’t know that it is not good heritage practice to
move a building within a heritage district) if anyone at city hall in a
position of authority reads her garbage i think that she may be first in
line for removal by speaking so poorly about fellow members and the role
of the public that she forgot she reps. while we're at it lets get rid of
the whole group and let kevin b. fill in for the rest of this term.
sherridan should not mention a code of conduct, she is breaking the
committee's now and until PDHAC clears the council version she has no leg
to stand on asking anyone to step down even if a committee member was
sharing committee info outside because there is no code to rely on that
would give her that right.
Comments
Dear Dirt:
You really have to institute some sort of literacy test.
Posted by: Graham Muirhead | May 11, 2009 06:40 AM
Graham, you kill me.
Posted by: Sadistic Schoolmistress | May 12, 2009 09:39 PM